Sunday, August 31, 2014

Perennials Prevent Weeds

From http://www.perennialmeadows.com/2014/08/perennials-prevent-weeds/

Late Summer Sensations In the Perennial Meadow Garden

Perennial Meadows Although I have had to neglect my trial gardens on the edge of Amsterdam this year following a decision to move house and all that involved, it is surprising just how well they have grown and how little work it has been to keep them looking good.
King_140827_13743The key to successful perennial planting is not only choosing the right plants but planting enough of them. My borders were planted densely in the first instance as these gardens are where I trial the plants I write about and design with, but as the borders mature the planting densities become even higher. The result is that there is little room left for weeds to become established.
Perennial MeadowsThere are some borders in my garden that have not changed for more than ten years and every year they seem to become easier to maintain; we are talking about less work than an hour per year in some cases.
Perennial MeadowsFour years ago I planted up two similar long borders and in the first year the mulches were essential to keep down the weeds. This year with no time to spare they have had to fend for themselves and apart from the occasional towering example of nettle or willow herb that seemed to have appeared overnight, there has been little else to deal with.
Perennial MeadowsEstablishing a balance between the various plants we include in our planting scheme is never easy and involves a lot of trial and error, but when it works life becomes a lot easier. That is not to say you have nothing to do. The new double borders contain a fine umbellifer, Cenolophium denudatum, which after a slow start has now decided to set seed possibly too enthusiastically. I need to watch it and this summer decided to remove all the seedheads before they matured – it was actually beginning to look untidy so the borders looked better after the half hour I found for the task.
Perennial MeadowsPlants compete with one another and we as gardeners need to referee. Sometimes I favour the thugs and allow them to take over, but in other cases some plants need to be controlled by reducing their spread every year or so – Inula hookeri is a case in point; I wouldn’t be without it, but it is a strong competitor.
Perennial Meadows with shrubsThe shrubs I have been adding to my borders in recent years are beginning to play a role; in some cases too much of one and this is again something I will eventually teach myself to understand and work with. Without the weeds, nature becomes something fun and enjoyable to play with.
Shrubs and perennials
This entry was posted in Practical gardening and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Thursday, August 21, 2014

One problem buying bedding plants and perennials from "industrial" nurseries

Is Your Yard Killing Bees?

Plants sold as "bee friendly" may not be all that bee friendly after all.

By Emily Main

Bees are in serious trouble. The tiny little pollinators, which save U.S. farmers billions of dollars in pollination services, are dying off by the thousands—a travesty that has led many a home gardener to plant "bee-friendly" plants in his or her yard or garden to provide a refuge for bees, far away from the toxic agricultural pesticides many scientists believe could be playing a role in their die-off.
But a new report, titled Gardeners Beware: Bee-Toxic Pesticides Found in "Bee-Friendly" Plants Sold at Garden Centers Nationwide, from Friends of the Earth US, Pesticide Action Network, and the Pesticide Research Institute finds that home gardens could be poisoning bees just as badly as large farms. The groups bought plants marketed as "bee friendly" at big-box home-improvement stores in the Washington, DC, San Francisco, and Minneapolis metropolitan areas, and found that seven out of 13 tested positive for neonicotinoids, pesticides known to be deadly to bees.
The plants purchased for the report included a number of flowers and vegetables popular among home gardeners who want to attract bees and pollinators to their gardens: tomato and summer squash starts, herbs, pumpkins, gaillardia, daisies, zinnias, and asters. Most samples tested positive for one neonicotinoid but the two gaillardia samples each tested positive for two types of the pesticide.
"The pilot study confirms that many of the plants sold in nurseries and garden stores across the U.S. have been pretreated with systemic neonicotinoid insecticides, making them potentially toxic to pollinators," said Timothy Brown, PhD, of the Pesticide Research Institute, in a statement. "Unfortunately, these pesticides don't break down quickly—they remain in the plants and the soil and can continue to affect pollinators for months to years after the treatment," Brown said.
Agricultural researchers have been sounding the alarm on neonicotinoids for years. The pesticides are systemic, meaning they're absorbed by a plant's roots and then travel into its pollen and nectar, the bees' food. Even if the pesticides exist in levels low enough to not kill bees, the new report states, they can still compromise a bee's immune system, impair its ability to forage, and exacerbate the effects of any other infections or diseases a bee might contract.
Because these pesticides are commonly used on large agricultural fields, they've been fingered as one of a complex set of factors that cause colony collapse disorder, the mysterious phenomenon that has decimated beehives since 2006. Yet, as this report shows, home gardens could be just as toxic to bees as massive monocrop fields, given that many home and garden centers treat plants with systemic pesticides to kill insects.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has just announced that the agency has developed new pesticide labels that will sound an alarm on any neonicotinoid pesticide, whether for use in homes or on large farms. The labels state that the use of those pesticides is prohibited anywhere bees are present.
However, it's unlikely those labels will show up on plants. Your best move? Go organic.
• Seek out USDA- certified-organic seeds and plant starts. They're prohibited from being treated with pesticides of any sort. And that goes for flowers as well.
• Evict pesticides. Even though the EPA's new labels will help protect bees, why risk killing any in the first place? The new report lists 55 pesticides sold to consumers that contain active neonicotinoid pesticides toxic to bees. In saving the bees, you'll be saving yourself: The inactive ingredients in pesticide formulations are often more harmful to human health than the active ingredient.
• Plant WILDflowers. Attract and feed wild bees by growing lots of flowering plants from spring though fall, especially native wildflowers, which attract not only bees but also birds and other wildlife that thrive in your local climate.
• Go au natural. Leave a part of your landscape uncultivated. Many native bee species are solitary, rather than social, meaning they don't build hives. Some nest in the ground, others, in shrubby, weedy areas.
• Call your congressman! A bill currently floating through Congress, Saving America's Pollinators Act of 2013, would call for national measures to protect bees, beyond simply labeling pesticides.Tell your local reps to support the act here.

From http://www.organicgardening.com/living/is-your-yard-killing-bees, you can find the links there.

Thursday, August 14, 2014

Species natives or native cultivars?

How native are your native plants?

 
    Nowadays, the word "native" has taken on a kind of glamour among gardeners. Many a catalog or garden center makes the adjective a selling point, often promising lower maintenance and butterflies. But how native are your native plants? And does it matter?
    Many virtues are claimed for native plants: They can handle the local climate, are drought-tolerant (at least if they come from the prairie) and require less maintenance (if you choose the right native plant for your garden's conditions). And native plants provide food and shelter for native wildlife.
But if you buy a pot of coneflower, tickseed, little bluestem grass or smooth hydrangea from a garden center or catalog, it's probably not exactly the species that grew here centuries ago. It's more likely to be a cultivar, or cultivated variety, selected for some characteristic that makes it more attractive or useful and easy to sell to gardeners.
    Sometimes the change comes from the normal variation that occurs in every generation of plants. In other cultivars, it was deliberately sought by careful crossbreeding, even between different species. Sometimes cultivars of native plants are referred to as "nativars."
    A cultivar may have more conspicuous blooms, like Annabelle hydrangea (Hydrangea arborescens 'Annabelle'), which has much larger fluffy white flower clusters than the native smooth hydrangeas. It may be more compact, like Kim's Knee High coneflower (Echinacea purpurea 'Kim's Knee High'). It may bloom longer or at a different time than the native plant, or it may be less susceptible to diseases and insects. It may have a leaf color or bloom shape not found in nature, like coneflowers and coreopsis with flowers that are double or downright odd.
    In the form of cultivars, many native plants — or sort-of native plants — have been welcomed into the mainstream of gardening. But there's a question: Do they really work like native plants? Do they still serve the functions of native species, particularly in supporting animals?
For many enthusiasts, that's the most important reason to use them: To provide habitat for a wide variety of other species.
    The manifesto of these gardeners is "Bringing Nature Home: How You Can Sustain Wildlife with Native Plants" by University of Delaware entomologist Douglas Tallamy (Timber Press, 360 pages, $19.95; bringingnaturehome.net). And cultivars worry Tallamy because he fears that altering native plants to make them more attractive to people may make them less useful to animals.
If the plant blooms earlier or later in the year than the original species, will it still be in sync with the life cycles of the insects that pollinate it? If the leaves are purple instead of the regular green, has the chemistry changed enough to turn off insects that use it as a food source?
    Hello Yellow butterfly weed (Asclepias tuberosa 'Hello Yellow'), with bright yellow flowers instead of the normal orange, appeals to Peggy Anne Montgomery, publicist for American Beauty Native Plants, a partnership with the National Wildlife Federation that markets cultivars as well as straight species.
"I think it's kind of fun to have another color," she says. "And the insects don't care."
    The problem, though, is that we don't really know whether the insects care or not. "Nobody has studied this in a scientific way," Tallamy says. The first attempts to answer the question are just beginning.
Other advantages claimed for native plant cultivars that matter to gardeners — drought-tolerance, hardiness, low maintenance — can be tested in the marketplace. But only careful scientific study can hope to discover whether cultivar differences matter to birds, insects and microorganisms.
Such research has started at the University of Vermont, where doctoral candidate Annie White is studying whether insects such as native bees that gather pollen and carry it from bloom to bloom will visit cultivars as often as they visit the straight species.
    In her first year's data with a small number of plants — hardly enough to settle the question — the results were suggestive: Six of nine native species attracted more native pollinators than the cultivars she planted with them. The light purple flowers of the straight native species New England aster (Symphyotrichum novae-angliae), for example, got more than a dozen times as many visits as the popular cultivar Alma Poetschke (Symphyotrichum novae-angliae 'Alma Poetschke'), whose blooms are vivid magenta.
On the other hand, the bees were equally happy to visit either cultivars or straight species of wild bergamot (Monarda fistulosa) and giant hyssop (Agastache foeniculum).
    White's guess, she says, is that "real ecological trade-offs" come in when the plant is very different form the straight species, with a distinctively different color or flower form.
    For most gardeners, the debate over cultivars and natives is almost moot, because only cultivars are available. True native plants are difficult to find in garden centers.
    Natural Garden Natives, a line of native plant species from locally collected seed, finds a market largely through plant groups' spring sales. "There's a two-week window in May when you can find them," says Trish Beckjord, who specializes in native plants at the wholesale grower Midwest Groundcovers in St. Charles, Ill. Otherwise, you must persuade your local garden center to order them.
    Tallamy wishes gardeners would take that step. "I would like to see the homeowner say to the garden center, 'I would like to have the choice of a real native species,'" he says. "You can still have the cultivar."
Some say that cultivars have value, even to the cause of native species. "Cultivars can help the starting gardener or help someone make the transition to more native plants," Beckjord says.
    Perhaps there is a range of native-ness in which every gardener can find a comfort zone. Tallamy and co-author Rick Darke have just published an inspirational book, "The Living Landscape: How to Design for Beauty and Biodiversity in the Home Garden" (Timber Press, 392 pages, $39.95), to help gardeners create attractive and accessible habitat gardens.
    In smaller or less casual gardens where big plants won't fit, perhaps lower, tidier native species might find a place among the foreign-born peonies and day lilies.
    A short coneflower may still feed a goldfinch in a tiny garden where its tall ancestors would flop. And it may be the first plant to connect a 21st-century gardener to the prairie past.

Saturday, August 9, 2014

Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United States

Nowak, David J.; Hirabayashi, Satoshi; Bodine, Allison; Greenfield, Eric, 2014Environmental Pollution. 193: 119-129.

Abstract: Trees remove air pollution by the interception of particulate matter on plant surfaces and the absorption of gaseous pollutants through the leaf stomata. However, the magnitude and value of the effects of trees and forests on air quality and human health across the United States remains unknown. Computer simulations with local environmental data reveal that trees and forests in the conterminous United States removed 17.4 million tonnes (t) of air pollution in 2010 (range: 9.0-23.2 million t), with human health effects valued at 6.8 billion U.S. dollars (range: $1.5-13.0 billion). This pollution removal equated to an average air quality improvement of less than one percent. Most of the pollution removal occurred in rural areas, while most of the health impacts and values were within urban areas. Health impacts included the avoidance of more than 850 incidences of human mortality and 670,000 incidences of acute respiratory symptoms.

Full article PDF available at http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/46102.